IMI

Collaboration is the Way Forward, says Report

Collaboration is the Way Forward, says Report

A report by Herbert Smith Freehills, Pricewaterhouse Coopers and the International Mediation Institute reveals that parties want to resolve their disputes through “mixed mode dispute resolution” and collaborative processes, rather than adversarial processes like arbitration – but their combative external counsel haven’t necessarily got the message.

The report, which is to be formally unveiled tomorrow, is based on the responses of more than 4,000 participants in the Global Pound Conference series, which included 28 events held in 24 countries throughout 2016 and 2017. The participants included in-house counsel, private practice lawyers, arbitrators, arbitral institutions, academics and government officials.

Continue reading →

Posted by Laura in GPC, News
Update: New Public Consultation On Shaping European Investment Dispute Resolution Policy

Update: New Public Consultation On Shaping European Investment Dispute Resolution Policy

The European Commission (EC) has launched a new public consultation on the EU’s investment dispute resolution policy along with the options for multilateral reform, including the possible establishment of a permanent multilateral investment court.

The EC is now calling for comments on its most recent proposals, urging members of the mediation, conflict management and dispute resolution community to participate in the process. Read more

Posted by Natasha Mellersh in GPC, News
Investor-State Mediation: Not Whether, Or Even When, But How

Investor-State Mediation: Not Whether, Or Even When, But How

It has long been suggested that public bodies are antagonistic to negotiating settlements with private investors. The supposed, underlying rationale is that government officials are reluctant to be seen as compromising the interests of the state, meaning that negotiating is unacceptable. The recently published International Mediation Institute Investor-State Mediation Criteria challenge that assumption.

There is a kernel of truth to every generality. State representatives are indeed appropriately sensitive to the political realities surrounding negotiation and settlement. However, truth be told, states the world over are, in fact, readily entering into negotiated settlements for differences and disputes with investors. Moreover, negotiated settlements are being reached not only for little disputes but also for very large ones. Read more

Posted by GPC Series in GPC, News
Ask An Expert: Andi Daze

Ask An Expert: Andi Daze

Andi Daze, Partner at D & D Partners in Lagos, Nigeria – where he was also instrumental in organising the Lagos GPC event. Here, he discusses the importance of data gathering in dispute resolution, his motivations and his experience as an organiser.

Would you primarily describe yourself as an advisor, user or provider of dispute resolution?

As an attorney, I would categorise myself as an advisor under the GPC’s stakeholder groups. Having trained and qualified as a lawyer in Nigeria, New York, as well as in England and Wales, I have been involved in both contentious and non-contentious legal practice across all three jurisdictions. Read more

Posted by Natasha Mellersh in Ask An Expert, GPC